Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
What's new
Members
New posts
Search forums
VIP
OSA Radio
Chat
0
Features
Tunes
Mixes
Events
Flyers
Forums
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
What's new
Members
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Welcome to Old Skool Anthems
The Old Skool Resource. Since 1998.
Join now
NATIVE INTERNET WEB RADIO PLAYER PLUGIN FOR SHOUTCAST, ICECAST AND RADIONOMY
powered by
Sodah Webdesign Mainz
Forums
Music
The Chillout Room
foookin controlling barstewards
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mr Radish" data-source="post: 714849" data-attributes="member: 7342"><p>Difficult issue.</p><p></p><p>Obviously the State want to ensure that all children are vaccinated for good health reasons and to prevent the return of polio etc. I can sympathise with their stance.</p><p></p><p>However, it does take away the right of parents to decide what they think is right for their child.</p><p></p><p>The big problem with giving parents the right to choose is some parents themselves. Whilst some parents are clearly medically aware and understand the issues, many others would only have to read a scare story and would stop their children having vital vaccinations on the basis of a Daily Mail article or internet rumour. </p><p></p><p>It is dangerous to suggest that all parents know better than the advice of the most senior medical minds of the country. </p><p></p><p>That said it does take away the right to choose, but I would also consider the right of the child not to have their medical future decided by a non medically aware parent over considered medical advice from the experts.</p><p></p><p>For god sake some parents can't even feed their children healthy food, smoke whilst pregnant and allow their children to get pissed by the age of 12.</p><p></p><p>If it was not for schools and the state they would get little care at all.</p><p></p><p>As I say, a difficult issue.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mr Radish, post: 714849, member: 7342"] Difficult issue. Obviously the State want to ensure that all children are vaccinated for good health reasons and to prevent the return of polio etc. I can sympathise with their stance. However, it does take away the right of parents to decide what they think is right for their child. The big problem with giving parents the right to choose is some parents themselves. Whilst some parents are clearly medically aware and understand the issues, many others would only have to read a scare story and would stop their children having vital vaccinations on the basis of a Daily Mail article or internet rumour. It is dangerous to suggest that all parents know better than the advice of the most senior medical minds of the country. That said it does take away the right to choose, but I would also consider the right of the child not to have their medical future decided by a non medically aware parent over considered medical advice from the experts. For god sake some parents can't even feed their children healthy food, smoke whilst pregnant and allow their children to get pissed by the age of 12. If it was not for schools and the state they would get little care at all. As I say, a difficult issue. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Music
The Chillout Room
foookin controlling barstewards
Top
Bottom