Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
What's new
Members
New posts
Search forums
VIP
OSA Radio
Chat
0
Features
Tunes
Mixes
Events
Flyers
Forums
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
What's new
Members
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Welcome to Old Skool Anthems
The Old Skool Resource. Since 1998.
Join now
NATIVE INTERNET WEB RADIO PLAYER PLUGIN FOR SHOUTCAST, ICECAST AND RADIONOMY
powered by
Sodah Webdesign Mainz
Forums
Music
The Chillout Room
Oldskool Tune formats (i.e. 320kbps MP3 vs Lossless)?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Art Awreet" data-source="post: 806953" data-attributes="member: 6890"><p>Hi All,</p><p></p><p>I know this topic has been partially discussed before, but I want to avoid the pitfalls I've made before with ripping from vinyl to electronic format (i.e. the poor quality 128kbps MP3 file mistake)</p><p></p><p>I've been reading a lot recently in Hi-Fi mags about the arguments for/against between lossless (e.g. Apple and FLAC) and high quality MP3 formats. However these argeuments generally do not differentiate between different music types which might have different bit rate requirements</p><p></p><p>I know that some audiophiles steer clear of even 320kbps MP3 files if possible, but does oldskool house etc have as much to lose in compression to 320kbps MP3 as other music which might have much more going on (e.g. instruments, dynamics in classical etc)?</p><p></p><p>I guess the question at the end of the day, is whether anything audible is lost in compressing House music to 320kbps</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Art Awreet, post: 806953, member: 6890"] Hi All, I know this topic has been partially discussed before, but I want to avoid the pitfalls I've made before with ripping from vinyl to electronic format (i.e. the poor quality 128kbps MP3 file mistake) I've been reading a lot recently in Hi-Fi mags about the arguments for/against between lossless (e.g. Apple and FLAC) and high quality MP3 formats. However these argeuments generally do not differentiate between different music types which might have different bit rate requirements I know that some audiophiles steer clear of even 320kbps MP3 files if possible, but does oldskool house etc have as much to lose in compression to 320kbps MP3 as other music which might have much more going on (e.g. instruments, dynamics in classical etc)? I guess the question at the end of the day, is whether anything audible is lost in compressing House music to 320kbps [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Music
The Chillout Room
Oldskool Tune formats (i.e. 320kbps MP3 vs Lossless)?
Top
Bottom
